Cialis fr


Conservative race-blogger Dan Riehl unraveling before your eyes

blog stuff, race, tragedy, wingnuts

Little Green Footballs’ Charles Johnson called out wingnut blockhead Dan Riehl yesterday. Dan accused unknown media conspirators of ‘lightening’ a photo of Trayvon Martin to play upon Americans’ sympathies. After all, black people look bad, light-black people look better, everyone knows this, and you assholes are trying to play games with Dan’s UNIVAC mind.

So many people read Charles’ post (27,000 hits and counting), it ended up at the top of Memeorandum yesterday. Dan, being brilliant as well as race-blind, called Charles stupid, lame, irrelevant, and tweeted that if Charles ever came by the neighborhood, he’d get beaten up. This came in between Dan raining the internet with half-eaten grubs, beating his sagging chest and pissing on the trees in front of his apartment.

Well, this wanted attention can’t go without some attention. Dan will have the world know what an idiot Charles Johnson is. Also, can you just believe these blacks? Or the Negroes and the black people?

What’s sad is how willing Johnson has been to throw away everything he seemed to once understand about the media and turn on so many once friends to do it. Worse is the race-based ignorance of so many blacks I’m seeing in attacking me, when they should be criticizing the media, instead

When Dan makes a race argument — ‘black people look guilty, grey people look less guilty’ — the blacks who react badly to it do so out of “race-based ignorance.” The guy who’s telling black people how the world sees black people is telling black people they’re stupid because they’re black. This is some sort of towering feat. Does Imbecile have a Mt. Everest? Consider it climbed.

No where [sic] have I said a darker image of Martin would suggest he was somehow guilty of something, or that it might justify his being shot in any manner.

Dan: “Clearly, it has been lightened, or softened, somehow. Along with other possible alterations, he looks far more, perhaps innocent is the right word . .”

Dan didn’t say that the dusky criminal face of Trayvon made him guilty of anything. He merely said the liberals photoshopped it to make him appear “far more, perhaps innocent.” Can anybody understand these blacks? Why can’t Dan say the dead kid belongs in a penitentiary yearbook? Everybody’s gone crazy.

Johnson, the many progressives and now many blacks who have been attacking me over it are being played and they don’t even know it. If anything, blacks especially should feel insulted and upset at the media, including the AP – not me. My whole point questions their judgement [sic] and worldview, not Trayvon Martin’s, or Zimmerman’s.

You have just read one of the greatest paragraphs in the history of blogging. The photo was never altered. But “many blacks,” who have seen more ethnic faces than Dan Riehl, remain mute in the shadow of the Associated Press’ racial crime. All Dan’s done, with his insect blogging, is question America’s judgment and worldview. That’s all. Dan’s also erecting a desert pyramid in his shorts.

By seeming to prefer using a lighter image of Martin to further fuel the story line that he was a total innocent in the encounter and Zimmerman is guilty before all the facts are clear, my concern is that they feel that making Martin look less black in the eyes of the their [sic] readers, somehow makes him look less guilty of something.

Are you cringing yet? You didn’t think you could have empathy for such an asshole. You surprise yourself.

As for the many blacks attacking me, when it’s actually the media, including the AP, who appears to be saying to them, lighter is better, while darker is bad, and they aren’t even able to see that, the pre-judgment and ignorance on display is just sad . .

Shall we just tiptoe away? Yes, we should. Dan is unconditionally pathetic.

Share
9 COMMENTS

9 Comments

  1. Jymn  •  Mar 25, 2012 @3:51 pm
    avatar

    The problem is that the more a winger embarrasses himself in public and then keeps digging, the more he or she is held up as some kind of victim, or hero if you will. Danny boy is in the Jim Hoft and Andrew Breitbart class of idiots. Flaunt your racism and ignorance until you are caught, then blame everyone else for the errors of your ways. It’s pathetic. But it is very funny.

  2. Wayne A. Schneider  •  Mar 25, 2012 @4:02 pm
    avatar

    Dan Riehl, Proud To Be Ignorant. Do RWers have contests to see who could come up with the most ignorant, fact-free, bigoted, xenophobic arguments to justify their hatred of people who don’t look like them?

  3. toma  •  Mar 25, 2012 @4:03 pm
    avatar

    It is funny. If only a poor dead kid didn’t get in Dan’s clunky way, it’d be even funnier. But after this, like you, I’m convinced that Dan belongs in the Jim Hoft category. Which is, like, wow.

  4. toma  •  Mar 25, 2012 @4:12 pm
    avatar

    @Wayne:

    Do RWers have contests to see who could come up with the most ignorant, fact-free, bigoted, xenophobic arguments to justify their hatred of people who don’t look like them?

    Umm, it’s called “blogging”? As far as they’re concerned? Jeez, Wayne, you probably know better than I do. Cotillions? Suburbia? Fat lady porn?

  5. toma  •  Mar 25, 2012 @4:36 pm
    avatar

    Dan takes to the Twitter to reassure everybody he’s doing fine, great, thanks everyone:

    How much ice cream do you think he’s eaten today?

  6. Crommunist  •  Mar 26, 2012 @6:11 am
    avatar

    Dan may have been making an exceedingly clumsy attempt to talk about ‘colourism’, which is the association between skin shade and race-based perception. It is not at all a new revelation that people tend to think better of light-skinned black folks than dark-skinned ones. If the picture was indeed lightened for that purpose, then it is indeed the media outlets that should be criticized for their racism.

    None of this excuses Dan’s reaction, but there may be the kernel of a legitimate point in there.

  7. toma  •  Mar 26, 2012 @7:30 am
    avatar

    Dan . . 1.) Assumed the darker picture was the original when it wasn’t. It was a copy of the lighter original. 2.) Alleged a conspiracy that didn’t exist. 3.) Refused to listen to people who corrected him. 4.) Called black people “ignorant” for not agreeing with him though he’s wrong.

    Dan did all of this to score political points after a tragedy where that same teen was shot dead in part, apparently, because of his ‘dark’ skin color regardless of its specific shade. Dan wasn’t making any point as nuanced as yours, Cromm. He was mounting a clumsy attack upon the tragedy’s aftermath, which he perceives as silly. It’s totally beyond him to say “I don’t know what photos came first, but if anyone is ‘lightening’ them, that would be painfully ironic.” Dan’s take was more like, “F*ck you losers.”

  8. Grung_e_Gene  •  Mar 26, 2012 @8:15 am
    avatar

    toma, I’ve been over there and it’s not just one post about a photo by Riehl. His goal is to provide a post hoc justification for Martin’s murder.

    As usual conservatives are ignorant and incorrect but, pointing that out earns one death threats over there from the right-wing bloggers who really feel Zimmerman acted correctly and they would do that to anyone (especially leftists).

    It’s evil…

  9. toma  •  Mar 26, 2012 @2:43 pm
    avatar

    I can believe it. That’s certainly the only purpose behind obsessing over Facebook photos of ‘Trayvon’ the way they’ve been doing for days. The truth can supposedly be discovered by looking at him, and the truth is he deserved it. Yeah, bullshit.