But you’re the lame one

Considering all the blahblah over Phil Robertson, the mudcaked millionaire-dealer of birdkill paraphernalia, and Pajama Boy, the surprisingly well-endowed homosexual opportunist biding time in your son’s freshman dorm room, one thing has become perfectly clear (funny what a difference a few days make). Though we may not have known either of these people a week ago, we know each of them now as archetypes.

One of them is rough and rugged, and the other is foofy and fay. One of them came to fame and fortune by way of hard-work and ingenuity, the other by way of ranging institutional propaganda. One of them is God-fearing, which is proper, and the other fears disease and the cold of night, which is laughable. Or to put all of this more generally and universally, one of them is really them. And the other one is you.


Get it? Hint: You’re not the one with the 1000-yard stare.

Pajama Boy vs G.I. Joe

There you are again, but on the right. I see you put whip cream on your cocoa. And he put an asswhipping on Adolf and the rest of the boys from Berlin, all the while wearing Phil Silvers’ grin. Later: He ferrets all the Mengeles out of Brazil and Argentina, wins a Nugent Medal of Honor.

Of course there were perhaps hundreds of Photoshops of the two partisan heroes side-by-side, but that was a lot like bloggers re-telling their favorite scenes from the Schwarzenegger/DeVito documentary Twins. It took the more ambitious and Christian among them to employ the Robertson comparisons to greater effect:


And you’re Louis Farrakhan. Or you wish you had that sort of “courage,” and were as well that sort of “hero” to the President notwithstanding his stance on anti-Semitic demagogues. Anyway you’re certainly no sort of Phil Robertson as you’re probably a Muslim. Or you don’t particularly mind them, which may be worse frankly.


And you’re this Arab fellow too. Who hates homosexuals more than you do? What, wait, he’s Persian? Who the hell even knows crap like that? Quote Erotic Nostradamus.

Of course you don’t even need the full side-by-side treatment to make a devastating point. Not with queer bait as candy-musky as Pajama Boy. Anything that looks remotely like him is instantly insulted, perhaps irrevocably. I mean:


She has a television show ferchrissakes! Or she used to, before she resigned after seeing her face on the internet. Eventually they just went after the source of the trouble – all trouble – and they animated him, as Pajama Boy:

pajama boy obama ramirez

Immediately followed by the more wound-up right-wingers trying more of their Photoshops:


Which is the bat-signal of course to start posting these sorts of things:


. . something I figured was a ‘n*gger’ reference. After some back-clicking I dug up the image here. The Freepers call this gentleman ‘The Looter,’ for lack of a more civilized name. I’m puzzled as to why the relevant characterization of ‘Hurricane Katrina Victim’ never occurred to them:

Hurricane Katrina

Feel free to Google him and see the many Stromfront.org generated images in which Barack’s healthcare pal is featured prominently. And aren’t these striking likenesses?



Which brings us full circle, as I thought it might. Any time the conservative klan get into a Photoshop frenzy, it ends in rank bigotry. That the sizable effort was initiated to demonstrate that Robertson was really a loving Christian, the sort of man that we could only aspire to be – the sort of real American that a typical conservative already is, effortlessly, without having to raise any stink until the neurotics resort to epithets, again – was guaranteed to act as only a prelude to a spectacle. The wider political ‘movement’ is overrun with racists and assholes, and that reality certainly can’t remain hidden for too long, even with a slick businessman turned cable-television star emceeing the show.


2 thoughts But you’re the lame one

  1. avatar Grung_e_Gene says:

    Look, it’s one of those really intricate, highly complex problems that isn’t. Conservatives are super mad that they can’t saunter down the road kicking poor people, hitting ni[clang]s with switches, while depantsing and slapping ‘sissies’ around.

    That is the Freedom they want, that is the Freedom that is being denied them.

  2. avatar toma says:

    I think this is more about the influence of popular culture. I think they believe that the reason Mitt lost in 2012 was because he wasn’t kewl. And if we’re to believe their narrative, the Hollywood Jews finally gave them a television show they loved very much, so shouldn’t they be our besties now? Didn’t we have a good time laughing at the same things? Wasn’t that enough? Or do we have to beat up somebody to get jumped into the gang?

Comments are closed.