The Dumbest Man on the Internet fights back against charges of right-wing bigotry. Just because CPAC featured segregationist Scott Terry doesn’t mean Racism! Liars!

BUSTED: Supposed ‘Racist Event’ at CPAC 2013 a Big Media Lie – Here’s the Truth
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, March 16, 2013, 9:39 AM

I spoke with K. Carl and his brother Karnie this morning at the Tea Party Patriot Live booth in the main hall. K. Carl Smith said how he [sic] was so impressed with the CPAC audience who immediately came to his [sic] young man [sic] defense during thee [sic] breakout session. His brother Karnie also shared this, [sic]

“At the book signing after the session Scott Terry shared with me that he supported a type of Booker T. Washington Republican. We shared with him that Booker T was greatly influenced by Frederick Douglas. . . then he bought our book and I shook his hand and said thank you. So he left informed and inspired.”

They were all later spied spooning outside Sushi Roku. No racism! Liberal calumny, that’s what it was. Take that! We now open the discussion to our readers. Comments?

Mercutio Lives • 9 hours ago

*shrug*

The average black Sub-Saharian African IQ is about 70 and the average brown “hispanic” IQ is about 80. In comparison, the average White European IQ is about 100. And anyone who’s read “The Bell Curve” knows that there’s a very strong correlation between race, IQ and general quality of life statistics.

From a purely scientific point of view, how does it make sense to flood high IQ White societies with low IQ brown people? So much so that White babies are now racial minorities in America, Whites of all ages are estimated to become racial minorities in about 20 years and brown “hispanics” are estimated to become the new racial majority by about 2050.

Wake up. This bipartisan supported demographic ethnic cleansing of Whites will not only completely destroy the Republican Party but also completely destroy Western (White) civilization this century. Stop being spineless politically correct cowards that are too afraid of being called racists to stop the libtard schemes of mass importing generations of low IQ left-wing voters in order to stay in perpetual power and spread global socialism.

---

Continue Reading »

Just came across John Derbyshire’s ultra-racist Trayvon riposte in Taki’s Magazine. This was surely inspired by so many black people talking publicly about themselves and their concerns. The tragedy has become too much for the National Review’s Dorkasaurus Rex to tolerate.

Derb reminds me a bit of my own Dad. He was an engineer. When I was 11, he gave me the talk about sex. It lasted ten minutes. It was the first time anyone read me a technical instruction manual, I guessed, from memory. At least it was in English, so that was nice.

There’s also a little bit of my sophomore year Berkeley roommate in Derb. He was 100% organic chemist, 100% of the time. I remember when my girlfriend came up from Santa Barbara to visit me, the roommate seemed impressed with her looks. The minute she stepped out of the room, he looked at me blankly and asked: “HAVE YOU MADE LOVE TO HER?” I tried to Scanners his fucking head, but he didn’t even blink.

What I’m trying to say: John carries on not only in combative and stupid fashion, but also with the sort of brain damage that renders him perfectly insulting. He and the similar cubes feel it’s a personal strength rather than a flaw people want to beat to death with clubs. John thinks he is the Excalibur that’s laid low the shallow premises and lazy thinking around him. He’s really an Asperger’s bully-hire the National Review trot out to headbutt liberals.

Women, for example. In September of 2009, he appeared on Alan Colmes’ radio show. This was his ‘political‘ argument . .

Alan: What is the case against female suffrage?

John: Well the conservative case against it is that, is that women lean hard to the left. They, uh, they want someone to, to nurture, they want someone to help raise their kids, and if men aren’t inclined to do it, which in the present days they’re not much, then they’d like the state to do it for them.

Got that? Again:

John: Among the hopes that I do not realistically nurse is the hope that female suffrage will be repealed.

You figure even the National Review might recognize Derb for the deeply disturbed man he is. But no, they just love him.

He is a shining example of conservatives’ calculated depravity. You have to assume someone so poorly mentally composed would stomp a toddler or start a tragic fire at some point. Today’s post comes close to doing it. Here Derb writes to warn ‘his’ kids in the same manner those tragic-glorious black people warn their own about America:

(10a) Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.

(10i) If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite but keep moving . .

Derb will swear he is honest and he is brilliant. He’s just mentally ill.

Little Green Footballs’ Charles Johnson called out wingnut blockhead Dan Riehl yesterday. Dan accused unknown media conspirators of ‘lightening’ a photo of Trayvon Martin to play upon Americans’ sympathies. After all, black people look bad, light-black people look better, everyone knows this, and you assholes are trying to play games with Dan’s UNIVAC mind.

So many people read Charles’ post (27,000 hits and counting), it ended up at the top of Memeorandum yesterday. Dan, being brilliant as well as race-blind, called Charles stupid, lame, irrelevant, and tweeted that if Charles ever came by the neighborhood, he’d get beaten up. This came in between Dan raining the internet with half-eaten grubs, beating his sagging chest and pissing on the trees in front of his apartment.

Well, this wanted attention can’t go without some attention. Dan will have the world know what an idiot Charles Johnson is. Also, can you just believe these blacks? Or the Negroes and the black people?

What’s sad is how willing Johnson has been to throw away everything he seemed to once understand about the media and turn on so many once friends to do it. Worse is the race-based ignorance of so many blacks I’m seeing in attacking me, when they should be criticizing the media, instead

When Dan makes a race argument — ‘black people look guilty, grey people look less guilty’ — the blacks who react badly to it do so out of “race-based ignorance.” The guy who’s telling black people how the world sees black people is telling black people they’re stupid because they’re black. This is some sort of towering feat. Does Imbecile have a Mt. Everest? Consider it climbed.

No where [sic] have I said a darker image of Martin would suggest he was somehow guilty of something, or that it might justify his being shot in any manner.

Dan: “Clearly, it has been lightened, or softened, somehow. Along with other possible alterations, he looks far more, perhaps innocent is the right word . .”

Dan didn’t say that the dusky criminal face of Trayvon made him guilty of anything. He merely said the liberals photoshopped it to make him appear “far more, perhaps innocent.” Can anybody understand these blacks? Why can’t Dan say the dead kid belongs in a penitentiary yearbook? Everybody’s gone crazy.

Johnson, the many progressives and now many blacks who have been attacking me over it are being played and they don’t even know it. If anything, blacks especially should feel insulted and upset at the media, including the AP – not me. My whole point questions their judgement [sic] and worldview, not Trayvon Martin’s, or Zimmerman’s.

You have just read one of the greatest paragraphs in the history of blogging. The photo was never altered. But “many blacks,” who have seen more ethnic faces than Dan Riehl, remain mute in the shadow of the Associated Press’ racial crime. All Dan’s done, with his insect blogging, is question America’s judgment and worldview. That’s all. Dan’s also erecting a desert pyramid in his shorts.

By seeming to prefer using a lighter image of Martin to further fuel the story line that he was a total innocent in the encounter and Zimmerman is guilty before all the facts are clear, my concern is that they feel that making Martin look less black in the eyes of the their [sic] readers, somehow makes him look less guilty of something.

Are you cringing yet? You didn’t think you could have empathy for such an asshole. You surprise yourself.

As for the many blacks attacking me, when it’s actually the media, including the AP, who appears to be saying to them, lighter is better, while darker is bad, and they aren’t even able to see that, the pre-judgment and ignorance on display is just sad . .

Shall we just tiptoe away? Yes, we should. Dan is unconditionally pathetic.

Pity anyone who ends up being defended by Ann Coulter. How so? 1.) You deserve whatever misery you’re drowning in, and 2.) you’ll be asked to crawl back to the rock you live under.

This Hannity clip is wonderfully bizarre. While Ann tries to defend Herman Cain’s perhaps past deeds of sexual harassment, she comes off wildly askew of American history, race relations, Herman Cain’s interests, common sense, propriety and reality.

What do you say of someone who applauds Herman’s supposed American authenticity by pointing out his family’s slavery past and concludes . .

“. . that’s why our Blacks are so much better than their Blacks!”

I leave our Blacks and your Blacks to that argument, Ann.

Incidentally, did you know? Sexual harassment laws were written to protect African Americans from Democrats. It’s true:

. . and now we’ve turned everything upside down with this ‘high-tech lynching’ of Herman Cain. The irony, it is salacious.

. . this hilariously dubious offering of patriotism comes from, I assume, some sort of mini-skirted spirit-leader for America! over at The Heritage Foundation.

Like any other reader of that blog, simply remind yourself that you, the captain of our football team, aren’t about to edit some wobbly facts when you’re only getting a love letter:

Morning Bell: Reclaiming Our Founding Principles

Posted July 5th, 2010 at 8:45am
by Julia Shaw

Happy Birthday America! America is 234 years old. She was born on July 4, 1776, with the passage of the Declaration of Independence. Since then, America has grown from thirteen colonies on the east coast to fill a vast continent.

Actually, Canada is bigger than we are. So, they’re better at ‘filling’ the continent. We’re certainly less than half-filling the vastness.

Her economic and military power is envied around the world.

Perhaps some of her things are envied around the world? Her school system certainly isn’t. Sadly, Julia Shaw, the writer, are mocked for her incompetence.

And the American people are hardworking, churchgoing, affluent, and generous.

Shall we go any further? Many, but nowhere near all, of her people are churchgoing. Ditto for hardworking (conservative bloggers being a durable exception). And something like 14 million children live in poverty in the U.S. What is that — 20%?

The Declaration of Independence serves as a philosophical statement of America’s first principles. As Matthew Spalding describes, the Declaration affirms that all men are created equal. By nature, men have a right to liberty that is unalienable, meaning it cannot be given up or taken away.

Philosophically speaking, yes, but certainly not in reality. The Indians and the Blacks and the Mexicans and the Women and the Gays . .

And because individuals equally possess such inalienable rights, governments derive their just powers from the consent of those governed. The purpose of government is to secure these fundamental rights, and the people retain the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so.

HAHAHA . . hoo! You’d think so, wouldn’t you? The Negroes waited a couple centuries before invoking that casual right, by getting a few hundred thousand white folks to die for them in a breezy war.

These principles have made America the great nation it is today.

More elementally: it is the willingness of a brave few people to hold the nation to these routinely unpopular principles that has made America the great nation it is today. Huuuuge difference.

But, since the early 20th century, these principles have been under attack in the academy, the media, and popular culture. So-called progressives have rejected the existence of self-evident truths—in the Declaration of Independence and elsewhere. Instead, they embrace the notion of “Progress” that is constant change towards an unspecified end. From these faulty principles, it follows that, all men are not created equal; some people are further along in the historical process than others. There are not permanent rights with which man is endowed. Government creates rights, and these rights evolve according to the demands of the time. There is no need for consent of the governed, just experts who will tell us how to live and how to progress.

This is a serious attack on our principles, but not an insurmountable one.

No, it was the progressives — they better understood American principles and fought for poor individuals during the Great Republican Depression of the thirties, employing them with the New Deal and giving their grandparents food money with Social Security. It was the actual America-savvy people who fought for civil rights in the sixties and who opposed the slaughter of the Vietnamese. It was those same leftists that backed feminism and saw that gays would rightly demand their civil rights as well. It was those people that saw Cesar Chavez for the hero he was.

What are we up to, now — the second half of the twentieth century? It’s the liberals who square the behavior of the United States with your precious Constitution. It’s the Heritage Foundation that opposes this, repeatedly, by calling themselves more patriotic than the few people who can qualify as patriots. It takes a lot more than some pom-poms and a blog page to force America to deliver on the Founding Fathers’ promises.

What is the Tea Party? Who is the Tea Party? Here are two of the faithful.

Which of these is a true representative of the ‘movement’? Lloyd Marcus, the singer? Or David Duke, the Klansman?

Or is one perhaps (or both) merely co-opting it for his own purpose? Is that the sanguine simplicity of the true nature of the Tea Party: everybody is, including Republican Party operatives, just out to get theirs? It’s no design inspirationally sheepish or foreign to the right wing.

One thing’s for sure, both of these guys can’t be experts on what makes their good buddies tick:

   

   

   

   

   

h/t Crooks and Liars . .

Doubling up on holidays, what a novel concept:

Utah state senator wants to create holiday honoring ‘gun pioneer’ on MLK Day.

Utah State Sen. Mark Madsen (R) is introducing legislation to create a holiday honoring John Moses Browning — the Utah native and “gun pioneer” who founded the Browning Arms company — on the same day as Martin Luther King Day. Browning’s birthday is believed to be around Jan. 21, so “Madsen proposes doubling up Browning and King”:

“I see them as complimentary,” [Madsen] said. Browning is known for developing a variety of guns, including the gas-operated machine gun. Madsen said he plans to meet with the NAACP to discuss his proposal.

“We’ll see if they can take it in the spirit it’s intended,” Madsen said. [...]

“Guns keep peace,” [state Senate Majority Leader Scott] Jenkins [R] said. “I kind of like the idea of making his birthday a holiday. I’m all over that.”

Salt Lake NAACP President Jeanetta Williams said she was “furious” about the idea. “It is not acceptable for the name John M. Browning to jointly share the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. holiday,” she said. “Dr. King was assassinated by a man using a gun. John M. Browning was a gun manufacturer . . “

Yeah, peculiar idea.

How about we double up Utah’s Pioneer Day with a “Native American Day” celebrating the people who discovered Salt Lake City a couple thousand years before the Mormons?

Or, instead we double MLK Day with “No More ‘Mark of Cain‘ Day” celebrating the Mormon Church’s 1978 reversal of previous policies denying Blacks from participating in their most sacred rituals and the priesthood because of their evil, black skin?

Then we can move “Browning Day” over to “Joseph Smith Day”. He was shot to death just outside of prison.

Human stem cell lines aren’t yet genetically diverse:

U-M Study Reveals Surprising Lack of Genetic Diversity in the Most Widely Used Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines
ANN ARBOR, Mich., Dec. 16 / PRNewswire-USNewswire

The most widely used human embryonic stem cell lines lack genetic diversity, a finding that raises social justice questions that must be addressed to ensure that all sectors of society benefit from stem cell advances, according to a University of Michigan research team.

In the first published study of its kind, the U-M team analyzed 47 embryonic stem cell lines, including most of the lines commonly used by stem cell researchers. The scientists determined the genetic ancestry of each line and found that most were derived from donors of northern and western European ancestry…

“Embryonic stem cell research has the potential to change the future of medicine,” said Sean Morrison, director of the U-M Center for Stem Cell Biology and one of the study leaders. “But there’s a lack of diversity among today’s most commonly used human embryonic stem cell lines, which highlights an important social justice issue.”

The same old issue: even if you could grow a kidney from stem cells and then transplant it, it’d be best that it comes from a genetic background similar to the recipient. So when you’ve got a limited stem cell population, you’ve got a limited target population for ‘cures.’

The current stem cell populations were derived from embryos generated in in-vitro fertilization clinics. Those clients would be upper middle class westerners of white European ancestry, ergo the genetics problem.

It’s crucial that diverse lines are available for this research to ensure that all patients benefit from the results, Morrison said.

“If that’s not done, we run the risk of leaving certain groups in our society behind,” said Morrison, who is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at U-M.

So what did Dobson’s FRC make of this science factoid and the call to diversify the stem cell pool?

It’s never enough with some of these people. Supposedly having at their disposal several hundred new hESC lines was satisfactory, plus the open-ended promise from President Obama of as many fertility-clinic embryos as they would like. But Michigan’s Sean Morrison . . .

“. . will also make it a priority to derive new embryonic stem cell lines from underrepresented groups, including African-Americans.”

So, apparently Prof. Morrison is going to be stalking minority couples at IVF clinics, targeting their embryos for his lab . . .

This is what you get when you edit Glenn Beck videos.

“…why do you people call yourself ‘African Americans’? Heck, I don’t call myself ‘White’. And I can say that because I, myself, am a White guy.”

Hoo!

So much for the ‘it was a colorblind practice’ defense:

Bank Accused of Pushing Mortgage Deals on Blacks

As she describes it, Beth Jacobson and her fellow loan officers at Wells Fargo Bank “rode the stagecoach from hell” for a decade, systematically singling out blacks in Baltimore and suburban Maryland for high-interest subprime mortgages.

These loans, Baltimore officials have claimed in a federal lawsuit against Wells Fargo, tipped hundreds of homeowners into foreclosure and cost the city tens of millions of dollars in taxes and city services.

“We just went right after them,” said Ms. Jacobson, who is white and said she was once the bank’s top-producing subprime loan officer nationally. “Wells Fargo mortgage had an emerging-markets unit that specifically targeted black churches, because it figured church leaders had a lot of influence and could convince congregants to take out subprime loans.”