Browsing the archives for the healthcare reform tag.
Cialis fr


Witness perhaps the stupidest man on planet Earth, Fred Barnes

*holes, conservatives, flat out dumb, I have derpes

Oh, weren’t these people smart? Oh my. The Heritage Foundation:

Morning Bell: Someone Needs to Tell the President His Health Care Plan is Dead
Posted February 26th, 2010

. . that reality is already spreading throughout Capitol Hill. Politico reports that while Democrats were hoping to pass Obamacare by Easter, “there were signs Thursday night that the schedule was slipping. One Democratic lawmaker involved in the negotiations, who asked not to be identified to speak candidly of the process, said the party would not, in fact, start down the path of reconciliation next week.”

And the Republican leaders:

REP. JOHN BOEHNER, R-OHIO, HOUSE MINORITY LEADER: “Democrats aren’t listening to the people. This bill is dead.”

There’s plenty of terrific gloating going on. And, with the pleasure of looking back and laughing, there comes a realization that some idiots seem to keep getting caught in the goat pen. Fred Barnes, for one. Fred Barnes particularly:

FRED BARNES, EXECUTIVE EDITOR, THE WEEKLY STANDARD: You know, scaling back Obamacare is a non-starter. Look, it is dead. It is dead in the House. It is dead in the Senate. I’m not sure it would have passed even before Brown. Nancy Pelosi was down to 218 votes and some of the more moderate Democrats were queasy.

fred barnes But the whole thing is dead. Republicans aren’t going to help out on this. The Republican position is get that off the table. We will start anew.


This hilariously, pathetically dead-skunk-wrong declaration by the Executive Editor of the oh-so-serious-and-ultra-important Conservative Institution got me to wondering: just how goddamned stupid is Fred Barnes? Turns out there’s an answer to that, and the answer is this: extremely.

To make the point for himself, looking back, Fred can start with the healthcare effort which he obviously knew nothing about. He compounded that documented prescience by writing a post detailing how the political world got forever upended by Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts.

Barnes’ brilliant highlights of the New Political World, point by point:

The Health Care Bill Is Dead
BY Fred Barnes

The impact of Republican Scott Brown’s capture of the Massachusetts Senate seat held for decades by Teddy Kennedy will be both immediate and powerful. It’s safe to say no single Senate election in recent memory is as important as this one.

Here are a few of the repercussions:

1) President Obama is weakened . .
2) Independents are lost to Democrats . .
3) In the midterm election in November, Republicans are poised to win 25 or so House seats . .
4) Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell is the new king of Capitol Hill . .
5) Oh, yes. The health care bill, ObamaCare, is dead with not the slightest prospect of resurrection. Brown ran to be the 41st vote for filibuster and now he is just that. Democrats have talked up clever strategies to pass the bill in the Senate despite Brown, but they won’t fly. It’s one thing for ObamaCare to be rejected by the American public in poll after poll. But it becomes a matter of considerably greater political magnitude when ObamaCare causes the loss of a Senate race in the blue state of Massachusetts.

Someone should have run and told Mitch McConnell he was the ‘new king of Capitol Hill’, he could have killed the dreaded legislation with a wave of his scepter. Or of some fabulous crimson-red right-wing fiat.

But Barnes’ insight is hardly limited to the dramas of recent law-making. Back in 2008, as the presidential campaigns came down to the wire, his genius similarly couldn’t hide.

The Huffington Post took an informal survey of 27 big-time ‘pundits’ on the probable results of the election. Hey, Fred — you’re a political expert who follows these things on a moment to moment basis, right? Who’s going to win it?

Election Predictions: Pundits Weigh In
The Huffington Post 11- 2-08

Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard editor
Winner: McCain
Electoral College: Obama 252 McCain 286
. .

Final tally: Obama 365, McCain 173. Pundits who predicted the poll leader, Obama, would win: 26. Barnes was the only one who ended up stunned by the Democratic blow-out. Mysteries.

So, he doesn’t understand Capitol Hill or campaigns. What about his fellow man, you ask? Perhaps he is the sort of man that knows men. Sadly, Barnes, given a year to get a handle on the election, couldn’t do any better at guessing who George W. Bush was — even after five years of junior’s presidency. For Fred, it made him a perfect candidate to write a lengthy biography of his fellow moron: “Rebel-in-Chief: Inside the Bold and Controversial Presidency of George W. Bush.”

So brimming with seductive intelligence and timeless enlightenment is it, it’s currently ranked #721,805 on Amazon.com. Go on, read it for yourself. Why not, when, if you’ve got a quarter in one of your pockets, you can pick up a couple dozen of Barnes’ hagiographies with the click of a button. And I mean brand spanking-new hardbacks, straight from Amazon:

Barnes Bush Biography


A book by fey diet and exercise guru Richard Simmons, “Still Hungry After All These Years: My Story”, can be had for the same price, but only if it’s used. The new copies go for around $5. Richard is hanging in there at Amazon ranking #500,250, a couple hundred thousand slots higher than Fred.

richard simmons Well, fine, Fred is no author either. He’s not exactly tapped into the culture, not keenly aware of what Americans are keen to devour.

Well, what does he know? Does he actually know anything at all? I have no idea what sort of actual intelligence Barnes has displayed, ever, anywhere, because I can’t find it. But I can tell you that he does seem to know how to be an obnoxious fucking prick.

For that assertion, I offer you his 2005 commentary on the Hurricane Katrina disaster. On a Fox News television set with fellow jerks Brit Hume and Charles Krauthammer, Barnes made clear his disgust with the irresponsible and predictable responses of the victims of the disaster:

…But my problem with it is that, in some of these areas, like a below- sea-level city like New Orleans, they’re not — they want the rest of us to insure their risk. As people who live on the San Andreas Fault in California, where they know there are going to be earthquakes, people who live along the Mississippi River in these low farmland areas…

… near the river, the floodplains. They know they’re going to flood. And when these things happen, they want the taxpayers all over the country to pay, and they do.

Hey, Fred — don’t you have a house in Florida, or something? Yeah, I do, thanks for asking:

[Mort] KONDRACKE: Yes, well, the question is, where do you draw the line? And that’s the problem. Do you draw it at the Barrier Islands? Do you draw it at Vero Beach, you know, where Fred has a beach house?

HUME: How did your house, by the way, do over the weekend?

BARNES: Well, it did fine, because we were on the Atlantic coast and the hurricane went to the Gulf Coast. So it missed it entirely.

HUME: It got rained on, right?

BARNES: But last year, when there were two hurricanes, and I got a new roof, I paid my part. My private insurance company paid the other part. The federal government and taxpayers paid no part.

HUME: What about the cover on your swimming pool? Did the government…

BARNES: I paid all of that.


And now I will point out that Barnes’ Fox commentary was going on during the afternoon of August 29th, the same day that Katrina struck. So Fred was ripping the sure-to-be-greedy victims of the disaster while they were drowning by the dozens. The Superdome, where the nation’s live-feed lens witnessed the survivors’ mortal misery and desperation, the place that the Bush administration only bothered with days later, hadn’t even opened yet.

After the worst disaster in United States history, the terrible toll: 1,836 people dead, 705 missing, 90,000 square miles declared disaster areas, over $80 billion in losses, and Fred Barnes is a stupid asshole.

New Orleans, by contrast, continues to recover.

Share
2 COMMENTS

Chuck Grassley, your classic asshole politician

*holes, healthcare reform, hypocrisy, politics

How these people manage to live with themselves is a mystery.

Chuck Grassley flip-flopped all over the place on the critical healthcare issues for most of 2009. But then the townhall screamers and racists made all the good headlines in late Summer. Being a spineless politician, he thought he saw a sure thing and threw his everything in with them.

Well, it’s now March 2010. Healthcare legislation passes, and, despite his fervent opposition and flat-out lying, what’s he saying today? That Americans can thank him for his ‘leadership.’


July: Why can’t I have decent healthcare, like you?

“You can. Go work for the federal government.”


August:

There is some fear because in the House bill, there is counseling for end-of-life,” Grassley said. “And from that standpoint, you have every right to fear. You shouldn’t have counseling at the end of life. You ought to have counseling 20 years before you’re going to die. You ought to plan these things out. And I don’t have any problem with things like living wills. But they ought to be done within the family. We should not have a government program that determines if you’re going to pull the plug on grandma.

Asked about Sen. Chuck Grassley’s comment that end-of-life care could “pull the plug on grandma,” [Howard] Dean pointed out that the Iowa Republican had voted for a similar provision for Medicare only a few years ago.

“All the House did was essentially repeat the same thing that Senator Grassley voted for in 2003 in their bill,” Dean said. “Now, how you can morph that into ‘pulling the plug on grandma,’ I don’t know. I think it’s despicable. I think it’s awful, the lies that have come out on this bill that are just designed to frighten the daylights out of people.”


Time magazine:

Why Grassley Turned on Health-Care Reform
By Karen Tumulty Thursday, Sep. 03, 2009

If there had ever been any hope for a truly bipartisan health-care bill this year, it came in the person of one cantankerous and quirky Iowan. For months, much to the consternation of many of his fellow Republicans, Charles Grassley, the ranking minority member on the Senate Finance Committee,grandma's fine had continued to negotiate behind closed doors with chairman Max Baucus and four other members of the panel. No Republican received more TLC from Barack Obama, who has met with Grassley three times at the White House and called him three times more just to keep in touch . .

That was then. In August, Grassley — who is up for re-election next year — held town halls and constituent meetings in 30 counties. While the sessions never got as raucous as they did in some other parts of the country, Grassley’s constituents turned out by the thousands to tell him how little they thought of his efforts back in Washington. One sign in the small town of Adel read “Thank God Patrick Henry Did Not Compromise.” Over the course of the recess, Grassley began sounding less like a potential Obama ally and more like the enemy army. When the Iowa Senator actually gave credence to the absurd notion that the House version of the legislation might allow the government to decide when, in his words, to “pull the plug on Grandma,” Democrats decided he was past the point of any hope. And then came Grassley’s late-August coup de grâce, a campaign fundraising letter. “The simple truth is that I am and always have been opposed to the Obama Administration’s plans to nationalize health care,” Grassley wrote. “Period.”


And today:

Grassley: Look How Great This Health Care Bill Is
Evan McMorris-Santoro | March 24, 2010, 12:58PM

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has long been a vocal critic of the Democrat’s health reform efforts, but today he started taking credit for some provisions of the bill, and talking up his own role in crafting the legislation.

In a release sent out by his staff to reporters today, Grassley says the bill will “hold tax-exempt hospitals accountable for the federal tax benefits they receive” thanks to his work . .

M E M O R A N D U M

To: Reporters and Editors

Re: tax-exempt hospitals provisions in new health care law

Da: Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Sen. Chuck Grassley, ranking member of the Committee on Finance, with jurisdiction over taxes, has worked to hold tax-exempt hospitals accountable for the federal tax benefits they receive. The health care legislation signed into law yesterday includes provisions Grassley co-authored to impose standards for the tax exemption of charitable hospitals for the first time . .

The provisions enacted in the new health care law are the result of
Grassley’s leadership on tax-exempt organizations’ accountability and
transparency . .

Share
Comments Off

Pregnancy and chick stuff in the olden tymes

ffail, healthcare reform

Monday, March 22, 2010

Pelosi: “After We Pass This Bill, Being A Woman
Will No Longer Be A Pre-Existing Medical Condition”

Posted by: Greg Hengler at 2:38 PM

“What on earth is this woman talking about?”



This:

Pregnant women trying to buy health insurance on their own are barred from maternity coverage because they have a “pre-existing condition.”
J. James Rohack on Sunday, August 16th, 2009, Fox News Sunday

AMA president says pregnant women are barred from buying individual health policies

You’ve probably heard of “pre-existing conditions,” which provide an escape clause for health insurance companies. If you have a pre-existing condition, an insurance company typically won’t pay for treatment.

J. James Rohack, president of the American Medical Association, cited them when he was asked during an appearance on Fox News Sunday on Aug. 16, 2009, whether the Democratic health plan would lead to rationing for older patients.

“Well, there’s a myth that rationing doesn’t occur right now,” Rohack said. “In the United States, if a woman’s pregnant and on the individual market (and) tries to get health insurance, that’s called a pre-existing condition and it’s not paid for. That’s why this bill’s important. It gets rid of some of the rationing that’s occurring right now.” The AMA endorsed the House version of health care reform legislation in July . .


MAN, that takes me back.

Share
Comments Off

Nancy Pelosi to conduct discreet medical records review

healthcare reform, whacko, wingnuts
Tuesday, March 23, 2010

A Point of No Return?
by Thomas Sowell

With the passage of the legislation allowing the federal government to take control of the medical care system of the United States, a major turning point has been reached in the dismantling of the values and institutions of America . . .

If the current legislation does not entail the transmission of all our individual medical records to Washington, it will take only an administrative regulation or, at most, an Executive Order of the President, to do that.

With politicians now having not only access to our most confidential records, and having the power of granting or withholding medical care needed to sustain ourselves or our loved ones, how many people will be bold enough to criticize our public servants, who will in fact have become our public masters?


Just this morning:

Obama Signs Executive Order Granting Nancy Pelosi Control Over Americans’ Medical Records

Merely minutes after signing historic and sweeping healthcare reform legislation today, President Obama surprised Republicans and thrilled his fellow Democrats by signing and issuing an Executive Order giving controversial House Speaker Nancy Pelosi access to every American’s medical records.

The order officially named the San Francisco Democrat the nation’s first Medical Records Review czar.

Pelosi wasted no time in declaring her intentions with her new position.

“I’ll be poking through every one of your personal records because . . uhh . . I care about you.”


[*knock knock*]

[door opens]

‘Hi, my name’s Tami. I’m going door to door signing up new voters for the Democratic Party. Are you already registered?’

‘Don’t waste your time, girlie. I am a life-long Republican, you’d sooner get kerosene from a turnip. Now you just run along . .’

“So how’s the diabetes, Bob?”

‘Wha –? Excuse me?’

“Your diabetes. Been monitoring your blood sugar, right? Keeping it in check I hope. Terrible, nasty disease.”

‘Wait — how the hell did you . .’

“Let’s just say I have smart friends. I understand, Bob, the dangle’s not showing the signs of life it once did. Doesn’t have the old hankering for Betty’s pork sandwiches like it once did, eh Bob? So sad, diabetes will do that.”

‘. . ooh noooo . .’

“You know what you need? You need some good ol’ insulin. Yep, insulin’s gonna take care of you, but good, Bob. Hey — you know who controls the supply of insulin, don’t’ ya Bob?”

‘. . alright, gimme the clipboard.’

“Terrific!”

‘Bastards.’

“Welcome to the Party! Now, where’s Betty?”

Share
Comments Off

Thank you, Newt Gingrich, you’re a good friend

healthcare reform, hypocrisy, wingnuts

. . But former Republican House speaker Newt Gingrich said Obama and the Democrats will regret their decision to push for comprehensive reform. Calling the bill “the most radical social experiment . . . in modern times,” Gingrich said: “They will have destroyed their party much as Lyndon Johnson shattered the Democratic Party for 40* years” with the enactment of civil rights legislation in the 1960s . .

(* The nineties? Bill Clinton? You were Speaker?)


Shoot. And now we’ve fucked up again. Thanks anyways, Newt, for trying to stop us. History will show you were just being a mensch.

The brain-scratcher for Conservatives here is why. Why would anybody do this? Obviously, it makes no sense.

We’re just stupid. Or we’re Commies instructed to kill the country. Or we’re Socialists trying to break a chunk of the nation off and float it on over to Holland. Or we’re Nazis for whatever reasons Nazis do what they do.

Really — what reasonable reason could we possibly have for doing something as politically risky as reforming the entire healthcare system? Hell — why did we do the civil rights thing? I have no idea, neither does Newt.

Share
Comments Off

Patriots attack

healthcare reform, race, wingnuts

Yesterday:

Tea party protesters scream ‘nigger’ at black congressman

WASHINGTON — Demonstrators outside the U.S. Capitol, angry over the proposed health care bill, shouted “nigger” Saturday at U.S. Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia congressman and civil rights icon who was nearly beaten to death during an Alabama march in the 1960s.

Protesters also shouted obscenities at other members of the Congressional Black Caucus, spat on at least one black lawmaker and confronted an openly gay congressman with taunts.

. . and . .

‘Tea party’ protesters accused of spitting on lawmaker, using slurs

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus said that racial epithets were hurled at them Saturday by angry protesters who had gathered at the Capitol to protest health-care legislation, and one congressman said he was spit upon. The most high-profile openly gay congressman, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), was heckled with anti-gay chants . .

Democratic leaders and their aides said they were outraged by the day’s behavior. “I have heard things today that I have not heard since March 15, 1960, when I was marching to get off the back of the bus,” said House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.), the highest-ranking black official in Congress.

Today:

Barney Frank: ‘Mass hysteria‘ on Capitol Hill

Tea Party protesters disrupted Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s press stakeout at a House Office Building, yelling “you’re a disgrace to your office” and one protester yelled a gay epithet at Rep. Barney Frank again on Sunday, adding yet another layer of chaos to an already tense afternoon on Capitol Hill . .

Someone in the crowd yelled “faggot” — an epithet overheard by a POLITICO reporter — at Frank, who is gay. A group of Catholics supporting reform sang a chorus of “we love you Barney, oh yes we do.”

“It’s like the Salem witch trials, and healthcare is the witches,” Frank said. “There is mass hysteria.”


Conservative bloggers, to the rescue! Ann Althouse:

The members of Congress have a lot of power, and they ought to have to hear the anger their exercise of that power is causing. It’s outrageous for them to pose as victims without very good cause. So what if some idiot said a bad word? That’s a trivial distraction compared to the power they are about to exercise in the face of such strong opposition to what they are about to do.

So what if they spat on you and called you “n*gger”? Christ, you’re about to provide millions of Americans with healthcare — have you no decency, sir?

Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs:

Big media only deemed fit to cover the people’s revolution to smear, libel and sexually smear them (“tea baggers”).

This campaign of destruction culminated yesterday when a specious charge was made that a protester shouted “ni**er” at the Congressional Black Caucus. Color me skeptical. I am not sure why the Black Congressional Caucus deliberately chose to walk through the crowd as they shouted “killl the bill,” but it sure sounds like a set-up.

Walking through the Tea Partiers? Just what were the Black Congressional Caucus thinking? They know damn well that they’re Black. I smell a rat.

Share
Comments Off

We came so close to Civil War

healthcare reform, weekend drive-by, wingnuts
March 16, 2010

Without Firing a Shot?
by David Limbaugh

During the height of the Cold War, some feared the communists would take over the Uniteddavid limbaugh States without firing a shot. Could it be that nearly a half-century later, we’re on the verge of that becoming a reality? . .

The people now attempting to govern us with an iron fist are Marxist-leaning in terms of not only the policies they support but also the ruthless tactics they employ to enact those policies into law.

As long as it served Obama’s Machiavellian purposes to maintain a semblance of unity for his ambitious agenda, he donned his bipartisan cap. But as soon as he encountered intractable opposition from Republicans, God bless them, he began to show his true political colors . .


SO BIZARRE, his tossing off the “bipartisan cap” after running headlong into “intractable opposition from Republicans.”

Better Presidents, especially Republicans, never behave so unpredictably.

The Greatest Republican of them all, Abraham Lincoln, for instance, was the exact opposite. This is straight out of ‘D00d’s American Guide To Total History’:

South Carolina was like . . “Dude — you got elected?! Tssh, we’re outta here.”

And, so, Abraham was like . . “Aww, man, don’t go.”

And South Carolina was like . . “Ballz. We are gone.”

And, so, Abraham was like . . “C’mon, man, please stay.”

And South Carolina was like . . “Yeh, I don’t think so. It’s war.”

And, so, Abraham was like . . “Awww maan.”


And right there, hammer-struck with intractable opposition, he cleverly gave in, thankfully preserving a genocide The Negroes still call “slavery” the end.

Share
Comments Off

Pat Robertson forgot to lock the doors

healthcare reform, weekend drive-by, wingnuts
March 19, 2010chris adamo

Washington chaos portends Obama’s vision for America
By Chris Adamo

As the nationalized “Healthcare” debacle nears its end game, the people of America are increasingly shocked and disgusted by the raw ugliness of the Obama “governing” philosophy. Those platitudes of “hope and change” are gone, and in their place a thoroughly regretful American populace now witnesses, to its horror, the total desecration of this once triumphal constitutional republic.


Okay — Bob? You go piss in the Mississippi river.

Jerry? You graffiti the Grand Canyon. With, you know, something like . . a Jane Fonda Jesus. Or, like, dude hanging from the cross with a weird boner.

Brian, you relocate the apse by extending the Badlands a thousand miles in every direction.

Keith, you throw stones at the stained glass. What? Behind Mount Rushmore. Idiot.

And Rick — you turn the wheel at the Boulder Dam. That’ll kill the internet, and then the pipe organ won’t work.

Tee hee.

Share
Comments Off

Ankles up in the President’s Pontiac

healthcare reform, wingnuts

March 16, 2010

Obama like a bad date
By Jen Shroder

jen shroder 3So President Obama has extended the health bill deadline yet AGAIN. What part of “no” does he not understand?

Hellooo, Jen. Ahhhhh yeahh, girl.

We keep rejecting him but he ignores our protests. His nudges have progressed into shoves as America is crowded like a cheap date into the backseat of his Pontiac.

O.G. pull and shoot MY LADY. Naw trubbles, naw wurries bitch. Good pussy Majority Party time for my clench-butt Farveh, uh . . Ferah, Favrah . . FARRAH. HAA. Helllooo teensy tight-ass Farrah from whevrah.

What’s that, Mah-Damm? Hmm — say what? OH yeah, that’s a promise. You just dig your heels in, ‘cuz once the rodeo begins, I will snap some real whiplash earthquake shit off. I will buck your quivering, naked tectonic ass-plate all night.

Like a cad who refuses to take “no” for an answer, Obama assures us over and over that he has the answer to all of our questions but doesn’t want to tell us what it is until after he’s had his way.

WHUT? . . AWWWWW. Shit, I, psshhh . . c’mon . . .

Most men this persistent get their faces slapped, but I doubt the Secret Service would understand.

WHA, WHY . . you . . . ?

. . okay, look — know what? Yeeaaahhh, YEAH, I know. You’re right, it’s my own fault.

I dig your independence, girl, keep my number.

Share
Comments Off

. . calls for a bedpan as this post has just pwned itself . .

ffail, healthcare reform, wingnuts

When you want to accuse Obama of mindless healthcare fear-mongering, perhaps you should avoid this line of attack:

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Obama Evokes Fear, Calls for Courage
by Debra J. Saunders

As a candidate for president, Sen. Barack Obama rejected “the politics of fear.” Well, he won. So now he’s playing the fear card to the hilt.

He’s been taking the fear card from his scabbard and burying it in your back? Bastard. He produced a deck of playing cards and told you to pick a sword, any sword? “The jack of excaliburs, sir — was this it?”

He does he do that? It’s a mystery.

Monday, President Obama went to Strongsville, Ohio, to warn that unless his ObamaCare passes, middle Americans should be very afraid of the day when they (Fear No. 1) lose their job or income, then (Fear No. 2) fall seriously ill and then (Fear No. 3) receive the health care they need, but lose valued assets.

Obama’s intended prop was Natoma Canfield, a 50-year-old cleaning woman and cancer survivor who dropped her private health care policy after Anthem Blue Cross raised her premiums some 40 percent to $708 per month. In December, Canfield wrote to Obama telling him that she was going to drop her insurance rather than lose the home her parents built in 1958. Alas, Canfield could not attend, as she since was diagnosed with leukemia and was in the hospital Monday . .

YIKES.

The fear is not that if you are sick that you will be denied health care. Canfield is in a hospital, and according to Obama, “She expects to face a month or more of aggressive chemotherapy.”

And the fear is not irrational — as everyone knows that worst trifecta could befall many working Americans through no fault of their own.

. . hullo? Hellllloooooooo?

Premiums will go up if insurers have to cover more sick people. Costs will go up if the government subsidizes more Americans . .

And Americans are supposed to trust this bunch to curb costs? Buy me a T-shirt and call me stupid.

Fine. You’re welcome.

Share
Comments Off

‘Social justice’ churches are Nazi traps

christianists, wingnuts

Say what you will about Glenn Beck, he’s no stealth wingnut. Sure, he’s dumber and crazier than a craphouse cockroach, but he’s not hiding it.

I beg you, look for the words ‘social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!

He’s going after your church now, the one that preaches the Commie/Nazi concept of “social justice”. After rejecting calls for withdrawal from Iraq and for universal healthcare for his fellow Americans, should we be surprised by his attack on something so fundamental to so many churches and to the very teachings of Christ himself? I suppose not.

But it surprised me, so I guess I’m a bit of a naif:


Witness the evils of “social justice,” per John Rawls:

Rawls asserted that, “There is . . . a general presumption against imposing legal and other restrictions on conduct without sufficient reason. But this presumption creates no special priority for any particular liberty.” (at pp291–292) This is support for an unranked set of liberties that reasonable citizens in all states should respect and uphold — to some extent, the list proposed by Rawls matches the normative human rights that have international recognition and direct enforcement in some nation states where the citizens need encouragement to act in way that fixes a greater degree of equality of outcome.

The basic liberties according to Rawls:

* Freedom of thought;
* Liberty of conscience as it affects social relationships on the grounds of religion, philosophy, and morality;
* Political liberties (e.g. representative democratic institutions, freedom of speech and the press, and freedom of assembly);
* Freedom of association;
* Freedoms necessary for the liberty and integrity of the person (viz: freedom from slavery, freedom of movement and a reasonable degree of freedom to choose one’s occupation); and
* Rights and liberties covered by the rule of law.


Don’t know why churches should be so distant from all that good stuff. The truth is that, of course, they’re not:

. . since the Catholic Church, the Black Churches, the Mainline Protestant churches, more and more Evangelical and Pentecostal churches including Hispanic and Asian-American congregations all consider social justice central to biblical faith, Glenn Beck is telling all those Christians to leave their churches. Of course, Christians may disagree about what social justice means in our current political context — and that conversation is an important one — but the Bible is clear: from the Mosaic law of Jubilee, to the Hebrew prophets, to Jesus Christ, social justice is an integral part of God’s plan for humanity.

Is it any wonder that the Civil Rights movement came right out of the pews? Who was that guy again?

Share
Comments Off

Rush Limbaugh imagines government healthcare, pisses pants, goes to Costa Rica to get free healthcare

flat out dumb, healthcare reform

A caller wants to know: if the healthcare thing passes, how the hell will you ever see another doctor, Rush? They’ll all have the bubonic AIDS, dude.

Rush says “Don’t be silly, Richard, the doctors themselves won’t be any different. Besides, I make 40 million dollars a year, I can always hire my own top notch personal physician.”


I’m kidding, he says he’s leaving the country:


Dang: “The health care system in Costa Rica is subsidized by the State and offers low costs and high quality. If you become a citizen of Costa Rica you will be eligible for free health care as the Costa Rica Social Security System provides free medical services to all Costa Rican citizens . .”

Share
1 COMMENT
« Older Posts
Newer Posts »