Right-wingers have a strange relationship with science. They don’t do it, they don’t like it, and they don’t understand it in the least. But they employ it frequently in arguments as a trump card. Like: Studies show that guns prevent violent crime, you idiots. But soon enough it turns out that’s not what the studies say. And that the best research, if it’s even applicable, really supports a different view. Usually the opposite one. That’s when science turns into a corrupt endeavor practiced by weasels who are in it for the money. Or for the fame. Or for any one of those other gaudy lures that a rigorous discipline is fraught with. Also, and, scientists are stupid.
Myer2 wrote: Why is algebra such a problem? Most of you feel science is a leftwing plot (evolution and global warming)-
Dear Comrade No. 2:
Science is not, in and of itself, a leftwing plot. For that to be true scientists would have to be cool people, not the mathematically-gifted, socially awkward wallflowers who never really had friends- or dates- in high school.
It’s our old friend. John “seventies vagina face” Ransom.
Elbert Einstein was the greatest theoretical physicist ever. He had rather childish views about money, economics and politics however.
That’s pretty strong. As you can see, John is one of the world’s premiere know-it-alls. He reads our e-mails, and he shits himself with laughter. He writes a column, then he thumbs through his indexed copy of The Humor of Milton Friedman.
The cool kids in politics- the people smarmy enough to get elected- use science and scientists to make the scientists feel cool and important. And then they get them to opt-in to their plan to “save the world” . .
Let’s face it; science is just a creative accounting gig.
Scientists are stupid. Well, when compared to the likes of the “Finance Editor for Townhall Finance” they are. A guy like that is a reality-devouring fact-spewing god:
Inflation: It’s Back
John Ransom | February 18, 2011
Data from China, the UK and the World Bank weighed in on Tuesday, revealing the key dangers the US economy faces from the economic and social policies of the Obama administration’s loose money program. The news makes the plainest case for budget cuts and increased deficit reduction favored by some members of Congress.
Inflation, once relegated to the historical trivia of the late 1970s and early 1980s, is back.
Ignore the Rally
John Ransom | February 28, 2011
Ignore the rally.
Now is the time to filter out the background noise that comes with market rallies and concentrate on individual equities.
I checked this: The Dow Jones at the end of February 2011 sat at 12,226. And Friday it closed at 14,712. So you can see why the Financial CEOs from the Townhall Finance Division of Finance made him “Finance Editor.” He may not be Elbert Einstein smart, mind you, but then hey who is? Wait – don’t tell me: Elbert Einstein.
But that’s only part of it. Scientists also let leftwingers off the hook for denying many proven scientific theories.
For example, leftwingers deny the link between breast cancer and abortions, the pill and cancer, although the science is clear.
Hello, it’s the American Cancer Society:
Another large, prospective study was reported on by Harvard researchers in 2007. This study included more than 100,000 women who were between the ages of 29 and 46 at the start of the study in 1993. These women were followed until 2003 . .
After adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors, the researchers found no link between either spontaneous or induced abortions and breast cancer.
The California Teachers Study also reported on more than 100,000 women in 2008. Researchers asked the women in 1995 about past induced and spontaneous abortions. While the women were being followed in the study, more than 3,300 developed invasive breast cancer. There was no difference in breast cancer risk between the group who had either spontaneous or induced abortions and those who had not had an abortion.
Ding dong, it’s the National Cancer Institute:
A number of studies suggest that current use of oral contraceptives (birth control pills) appears to slightly increase the risk of breast cancer, especially among younger women. However, the risk level goes back to normal 10 years or more after discontinuing oral contraceptive use.
Women who use oral contraceptives have reduced risks of ovarian and endometrial cancer. This protective effect increases with the length of time oral contraceptives are used.
So that would be yes, the science is clear. Scientists are stupid.